|
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
 |
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Bookmarks window folder suggestion (Read 2543 times)
|
thezombie
Newbie

Posts: 9
|
I'd love it if the Bookmarks window could remember the open or closed state of the folders between application launches. Right now, upon opening Yummy, all folders in the Bookmarks window are closed. That's not the way I left them.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JD
|
Yep, already on my To Do list 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JD
|
Actually, scrub that. I just removed it from my To Do list ... It was so easy, I added into the next beta 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
thezombie
Newbie

Posts: 9
|
Awesome!
Would that be in 1.7.3 b2?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JD
|
b2 has already been built and sent as a test for someone, so the next beta will be b3, and yes it will be in that 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spacific
|
A related setting would be for the bookmark to remember the state of folders on the server (and the Mac I suppose) -- i.e. whether they are open or closed in list view. Each time I open a connection I have to go through opening three or four folders that I always work with. (This may have been discussed before, as it rings a distant bell.) Hopefully this will take you under an hour as well Jason 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JD
|
Unfortunately this is way more tricky... the implementation would be different, but I'm pretty sure it could be done though! I will check it out.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
spacific
|
OK, two hours...
Don't you just need to remember a list of which folders are "open"? Then when you first display the nominated folder in the initial path, you look to see if you hit any in the list, if so open them, relist, and so on, recursively. I know it's more complicated but I would have thought reasonably straightforward compared with some of the juggling you have been doing e.g. dealing with dual browsing.
Cheers, anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JD
|
Yes, that pretty much sums it up. Compared to what I needed to do for the Bookmarks list, that's a lot more work, but certainly do-able. Maybe more than two hours, but nowhere near as complex as the dual browse can of worms 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
|
|
|